Tran Ngoc Hieu *

* Correspondence: Tran Ngoc Hieu (email: haingoc79@gmail.com)

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper surveys the evolution of the play concept in modern literary theories. The concept of play thus has no single definition and cannot be reduced to some accountable features. It should be seen as a subtle mechanism that lies in the operation of culture and in the construction and deconstruction the categories of epostemology by which the human mental spaces are established and underminded. The concept of play has shifted form ít concentration on the performance of play subject in romanticism's discourse to its emphasis on the deconstruction of the subject in postmodernism's discourse, seeing subject as merging with in language which is already a play system. The ideas of the playful nature of literature has also been re- evaluated. In modern paradigm, the playful nature of art involves with is autonomy, its aestheicism, its foregrounding of art forms. However, in postmodern paradigm, this aspect of art cannot be separated with the politics of culture and cannot be outside of the struggle for cultural power. These awareness of the nature of literary play not only influences the literary critism but also affects the creative writings.
Keywords: Literary theory, theories of play, the playful nature of literature, modernism, postmodernism

Article Details

References

[1]Nicolas Davey. "Gadamer's Aesthetics", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer-aesthetics

[2] Jacques Derrida.“Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of Human Sciences" Modern Literary Theo-y:A Reader, Patricia Waugh & Phillip Rice chủ biên, Arnold Publisher: London, 2001.

[3] Brian Edwards. Theories ofPlay and Postmodern Fiction, Garland Pub, 1998.

[4] Ju lius Elias.“Art and Play”,http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view docld=DicHist/uvaBook/tei/DicHistl.xml:chunk.id=dv1-17;toc.depth=1;toc.id=dvl-17;brand=default;query=Dictionary%20of%20the%20History%20of%20Ideas#1

[5] Lawrence M.Hinman.“Nietzsche's Philosophy of Play”,Philosophy Today,18:2,(1974:Summer).

[6] Johan Huizinga. Homo Ludens, Press: Boston, Beacon,1955.

[7] Manina Jones.“Textuality” Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory,

Irena R. Makaryk chu biên,University of Toronto Press,1995.

[8] John Lye, “Lý thuyết văn chương đương đại”, Hải Ngọc dịch, Tạp chí Vǎn học nước ngoài, số 2-2009.

[9] Peter J.Rabinowitz.“Reader-Oriented Theories of Interpretation" trong The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: From Formalism to Poststructuralism, Cambridge University Press,2008.

[10] Edward Said.“The Problems of Textuality:Two Exemplary Positions", Critical Inquiry, Vol.4, No.4.Summer 1978.

[11] Sarah Salih. Judith Butler, Routledge:London,2002.

[12] Gordon Slethaug. “Game Theory”and “Play/freeplay theories” trong Encyclopedia of ContemporaryLiterary Theory, Irena R. Makaryk chủ biên, University of Toronto Press, 1995.

[13] Mihai Spariosu. Literature, Mimesis and Play, Gunter Narr Verlag Tubingen, 1982.

[14] Mihai Spariosu. Dionysus Reborn: Play and the Aesthetic Dimension in Modern Philosophical andScientific Discourse, Cornell University Press: Ithaca, 1989.

[15] Trần Đình Sử (2002), “Lý thuyết các nền văn hóa của Bakhtin và tư duy tiểu thuyết hiện đại”, Tạp chí Sông Hương.

[16] Trần Đình Sử (chủ biên, 2008), Lý luận văn học (tập II) - Tác phẩm và thể loại văn học, NXB Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội.

[17] Đỗ Lai Thúy (2000), Phân tâm học và văn hóa nghệ thuật, NXB Văn hóa thông tin.

[18] Hoàng Ngọc Tuấn (2002), “Viết, từ hiện đại đến hậu hiện đại” trong Vǎn học hiện đại và hậu hiện đại qua thực tiễn sáng tác và góc nhìn lý thuyết, Văn nghệ: Hoa Kỳ.

[19] Robert Rawdon Wilson. “Play, Transgression and Carnival: Bakhtin and Derrida on Scriptor Ludens”,Mosaic,19:1,1986:Winter.