Nguyen Thien Tong *

* Correspondence: Nguyen Thien Tong (email: 405_nguyenthientong@gmail.com)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Most of higher education institutions in Southeast Asia and in countries around the world are multidisciplinary universities, while Vietnamese higher education institutions are mainly narrow or mono-disciplinary ones. So that when these narrow or mono-disciplinary institutions merge together to form multidisciplinary universities that include natural sciences, engineering and technology, economic, law, medical, education, social sciences and humanities... models of university council should be implemented. University council and university autonomy are very different between countries of continental Europe, England, America and Asian countries... The number of members and organizational structure are different too. World models of university council continue to evolve in many ways. However the model of university governance of a not-for-profit organization becomes more popular and appropriate for both public and private universities.

Article Details

References

1. Fabrice Hénard and Alexander Mitterle (2010), A Review of Governance Arrangements and Quality Assurance Guidelines, Governance and Quality Guidelines in Higher Education, OECD.

2. Nguyễn Thiện Tống (2013), “Giáo dục đại học Việt Nam chậm cải tổ", Thời đại mới, Số 28, tháng 8/2013.

3. John Yu AC (Chancellor), Wyatt R. Hume (Vice-Chancellor), Kevin McConkey (President of Academic Board) (2002), Meeting the Challenge: The Governance and Management of Universities, University of New South Wales, September 2002.

4. Leon Trakman (2008), Modelling University Governance, University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series.

5. Richard Bertrand, University Governance in Canada (2003), A Chairman's Point of View.

6. Emil A. Ricci (1999), College and University Governance in the United States: A Historical Survey.

7. William E. Piland (1994), The Governing Board, Managing Community Colleges, A Handbook for Effective Practice, Jossey-Bass Inc.

8. Duff Berdahl (1966), The Duff Berdahl Report on University Governance in Canada.

9. F. John Fielden (2009), Global Trends in University Governance, World Bank, Education Working Paper Series, Number 9, 2009.

10. Don Anderson and Richard Johnson (1998), University Autonomy in Twenties Countries, Center for Continuing Education, The Australian National University.

11. Pierre Dubois (1998), (Project Coordinator, University of Paris X, France), Evaluation and Self-Evaluation of Universities in Europe, Final Report 1998.

12. Georg Krucken (2011), An European Perspective on New Modes of University Governance and Actorhood, International Center for Higher Education Research, University of Kassel, Germany, December 2011.

13. Harry de Boer and Jon File (2009), Higher Education Governance Reforms across Europe, ESMU (European Center for Stratergic Management of Universities).

14. Ingrid Moses (1996), (Deputy Chancellor, University of Canberra), The Future of Universities: from an Asian-Pacific Perspective, Paper presented at the Symposium on The Future of Universities, Santiago, Chile.

15. Chancellors and Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee on University Governance, October 2003.

16. Mary Foley (2002), University Governance: An External Trustee's Perspective, Paper delivered at AVCC National Conference on University Governance, October 2002.

17. E. Maurice Kogan and Ivar Bleiklie, Organisation and Governance of Universities, UNESCO 2007.

18. Walter G. DeSocio (2012), Future Trends in Higher Education Board Governance, University Business, April 2012.