Hoang Thi Phuong Thao * , & Nguyen Dinh Binh

* Correspondence: Hoang Thi Phuong Thao (email: thao.htp@ou.edu.vn)

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of the marketing mix factors on students’choice of private universities. The survey of 326 first-year students of 10 private universities in Ho Chi Minh City was conducted. The results identified 7Ps of marketing mix that play important roles on students’ choice: people, price, physical evidence, program, place, process, and promotion. At the same time, this study explored differences of the importance levels of 7Ps on students’ choice among various groups of universities. The research results gave managerial implications in the field of educational marketing to remind the universities more focus on marketing mix to attract potential students.
Keywords: marketing mix, educational marketing, private university, students’ choice.

Article Details

References

[1]. Alipour M, Aghamohammadi A, Ahmadi R, Hoseini S.H. (2012). A new educational marketing mix: The 6ps for private school marketing in Iran. Research Joural of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. Vol 4 (21), pp. 4314-4319.

[2]. Binsardi A, Ekwulugo F. (2003). International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. Vol 21 (5), pp. 318-327.

[3]. Hanson K, Litten L. (1989). Mapping the road to academia: A review of research on women, men and college selection process. In The undergraduate woman: Issues in education, edn. P. Perun, 73-98. Lexington: Lexington Books.

[4]. Hossler D, Gallagher K.S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three phase model. College and University. Vol 62(3), pp. 207-221.

[5]. Hossler D. (1999). Effective admissions recruitment. New Derections for higher education. Vol 108, pp. 15-30.

[6]. Hoyer W.D, McInnis D.J. (2001). Consumer behaviour. 2nd Edn. Boston.

[7]. Ioan C.E. (2011). Marketing higher education using the 7 Ps framework. Bulletin of the Transilvania University ò Brasov. Vol 4 (53). No 1.

[8]. Ivy J. (2008). Higher education institution image: A correspondence analysis approach. International Journal Education Management. Vol 15 (6-7), pp. 276-282.

[9]. Jackson F. (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 32(127), pp. 127-136.

[10]. Kotler P., Fox K. (1995). Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions. 2nd Edn. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

[11]. Kotler P. (2008). Marketing management. Prentice Hall.

[12]. Lamb C.W, Hair J.F., McDaniel C., Boshoff C., Terbalancle N.S., (2004). Marketing management. 2nd Edn. Oxford University Press.

[13]. Lin L. (1999). Linking marketing and TQM in Higher Education Institutions. Dutch Quality Schools. The Hague.

[14]. Lockhart M.J. (2005). How to market your school. Universe books.

[15]. Luật Giáo dục (2005). Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Lao Động.

[16]. Luật Giáo dục Đại học. (2012). TP.HCM: Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức.

[17]. Rudd D, Mills R. (2008). Expanding marketing principles for the sale of higher education. Contemporary Issues In Education Research. Vol 1 (3).

[18]. Sandra J.S., (2009). Informing graduate enrollment management: marketing and admissions through students’ perspectives. Unpublished doctor’s thesis.

[19]. Shah P., (2009). International marketing of UK education – Astudy on students’ perception. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Chester, United Kingdom.

[20]. Soedijati E.K, Pratminingsih S.A. (2011). The Impacts of marketing mix on students’ choice of university: study case of private university in Bandung, Indonesia. 2nd International conference on business and economic research proceeding. Widyatama University.

[21]. Soedijati E.K. (2006). The influence of marketing mix on student satisfaction and student loyalty. Unpublished paper. Widyatama University.

[22]. Wentling T.L. (1993). Planning for Effective Training: A Guide to Curriculum Development. FAO, Rome.