Chau Thi Khanh Linh *

* Correspondence: Chau Thi Khanh Linh (email: linhctk@vhu.edu.vn)

Main Article Content

Abstract

In teaching listening, it is widely known that a good pattern for listening session should include three stages: pre-listening, while-listening, and post-listening. The aim of this paper is to investigate the employment of pre-listening activities to help improve English-majored students’ listening compre- hension at Van Hien University. The paper first defines the listening process and then reviews various pre-listening activities that are used in teaching and learning listening skill. In order to illustrate the importance of the use of pre-listening activities, the experiment was employed with the participation of two separate groups: one experimental group and one control group. Pre- and post-tests were used to explore students’ performance before and after the use of pre-listening activities in teaching listening lessons. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups after the experiment. This difference was in favor of the group experiencing pre-listening activities. Finally, from the research findings, recommendations were made in the hope of improving listening practice and teaching.
Keywords: listening skill, pre-listening activities, English-majored students

Article Details

References

Berman, M. (2003). Advanced listening. DynEd International, Inc.

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carrell, P.L. and Eisterhold, J. (1983).‘Sche- ma theory and ESL reading pedagogy’, TESOL Quarterly, 17 (4), pp. 553-573.

Coakly, C., and Wolvin, A. (1986). Listening in the native language. Listening, reading and writing: Analysis and application, 11- 42. Middlebury: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.

Eastman, J.K. (1987). Remedial training in lis- tening comprehension. System, 15, pp. 197-201.

Ehsanjou, M., and Khodareza M. (2014). The Im- pact of Using Different Forms of Pre-lis- tening on Iranian EFL Learners’Listening Comprehension. ELT Voices, 4 (6), pp.1-10.

Field. J. (1998). The changing face of listen- ing. English teaching professional. In J.C. Richard., and W.A. Renandya (Eds), Methodology in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, pp. 267-83.

Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. New York: Longman.

Lindsay, C. and Knight, P. (2006). Learning and Teaching English, A course for teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.

Loan, N.T.T. (2008). The impact of pre-listening strategy instruction on improving non-En- glish-majored students’ listening skill at Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry. Master of Arts Thesis, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Human- ities, Vietnam.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Oxford, R.L. (1993). Language learning strate- gies in a nutshell: Update and ESL sugges- tions. TESOL journal.

Pearson, P.D., and Fielding, L. (1983). Instructional implications of listening comprehension research. Illinois: Center for the Study of Reading.

Richard, J.C. and Renandya, W.A (2002). Method in language teaching. New York: Cam- bridge University Press.

Tham, T.T.P. (2011). The Impact of Pre-listening activities on tenth graders’ listening per- formance. Master of Arts Thesis, HCMC Open University.

Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. New York: Longman.

Wilson, J. J. (2008). How to teach listening. Ed- inburgh: Longman.